Kathmandu. A person named Deepak Oli held a press conference saying that Siddhartha Bank cheated me, I was ruined by bank managers.When we saw a citizen holding a press conference with a bag full of papers, we listened to him, and asked what it was. Oli showed a bag file and said, “I have been wronged, managers ate my money , and burdened me with debt .” He was also showing various statements . was showing the photo and phone number of the manager who cheated him. Why would a common borrower do this? We tried to ask the same question to the bank. We called the bank’s information officer Prasanna Khadka not once, but twice, but 18 times. But no, even if he had tried so hard, he would have been happy to say stone, Siddhartha pleased sir did not speak. Then we broadcast the program with the details of the incident as told by Oli, and through the program itself, we said that Siddhartha should take action against his employees, to the employees of the bank , Take legal action against Oli, who is a thief, robber. Whether is the correct or or . Both cannot be correct . Let it be investigated, Milk Milk Milk Separate.

After we broadcast the program , Siddhartha Bank issued a statement saying, “Dilip Singh Oli is not our client or depositor.After the bank issued a statement with the intention of not repaying the loan, we called Oli and told him. “Can you answer our questions ? The bank has said that you are not a borrower, why are you making such an accusation? Is there evidence of the accusation? You have called a fraud with the photo and name of an employee of the bank, are you ready to face legal action if that allegation is not proven?”

The program was broadcast and Prasanna Khadka also called the finance concern and said, landline was broken, so could not be contacted{{{}. And the information officer, and don’t you have to make a broken phone in such a bank? In response to our question, he said, “This time it happened, I have sent it today to buy a new mobile number, from today I will be contacted.” On the same day, a new phone number was updated on the bank’s website.

And we asked Prasanna Khadka, “What is the matter of this Rs 23 crore scam?” He claimed that there was nothing wrong with the employees of the bank. However, when Oli came to the office of the Finance Concern, and showed some papers, it was proved that the bank had spread the illusion that was a statement. In the name of hiding the incident, the bank had diverted the case from . The bank has already taken action against 2 people after it was proved that Dilip Singh Oli was a fraud and the same information was given to the Nepal Rastra Bank.

After looking at the documents and asking the banking experts about it,we have come to some point conclusions, where some misdeeds of the employees of the bank have been clearly seen and some of the weaknesses of the borrowers have been seen. Let’s take a look at what this case is.

1. First of all, let’s go to the bank’s claim that Dilip Singh Oli, who held the press conference, is not our customer and borrower . The bank says that Oli is not the main borrower and depositor of the bank and the depositor of the bank. However, the fact that has been hidden by the bank is that Dilip Singh Oli is the guarantor of the file of the loan given by the bank. Dilip Singh Oli PG was one of the 8 companies that the bank had lent . Oli was running a food business and Siddhartha Bank had given loans to various companies in the name of various members of his family. Oli PG is one of those loans. And Dilip Singh Oli, a person in the family, has come to the media saying that they have been trapped in the loan. 

The bank has expressed the intention that Dilip Singh Oli is not related to us through a statement {{} but the bank has contacted Oli through various letters . For example, see this letter, where Bank has also sent a letter to Dilip Singh Oli . 

Now it became clear that the bank was trying to divert the subject by saying that Dilip Singh Oli is not the person concerned. Dilip Singh Oli is also the PG of this related loan, the debtor is his brother, daughter-in-law and wife. And he told the family about the loss. Here is the place where the bad intentions of the bank to divert the subject by saying that Oli is nobody.

2. The bank seems to have held a press conference with the bank through a press release if any complaint is received through the Rastra Bank. However, it is also found that the borrower Dilip Singh Oli has gone to the Rastra Bank with this case, the Rastra Bank has asked Siddhartha and Bank has also sent a letter to the Rastra Bank admitting that the bank has taken action against its employees for inappropriate and illegal transactions with the borrower. But the bank has hidden this fact in the statement, thinking that the letter will go out. However, in the letter, the bank has clearly admitted that its employees have done illegal transactions with the borrower.

3. The bank has also expressed grief over Dilip Singh Oli calling his senior officials a fraud and a thief through a statement. But Oli is saying that they are swindlers, if they are not proved to be thugs and if I am proved wrong, I am ready to go to jail for calling them thugs.

Looking at Dilip Singh Oli’s confidence, it can be said that Siddhartha Bank is trying to hide this case to a great extent.Yes, in 2000 employees, or .Just because a few employees are liars does not mean that all the employees of the bank can be called liars, bank cannot be said to be completely rogue. However, Siddhartha did not correct by hiding the details of the erring employee.

This is a statement, a statement that does not have someone’s signature, seal , that too is a lie, there is no need to say much about the paper that has been deciphered. So let’s move on to and .

Let’s first understand what the event is?

Dilip Singh Oli’s family runs a food business. They have and firms with different names. Oli Siddhartha, who had never taken a loan from bank , took a loan of Rs. 50 lakhs in bank. The employees of the bank were also under pressure from the target, what to take 50 lakhs, crores of crores. Even Oli, who has never dealt with loan with bank, thought that it would be so easy to get money in } bank, then and if he had to pay interest only on the money used, then did {{} correct where the bank’s employee said. The employees of the bank asked for the seal of of the companies, which Dilip provided. Turnover would be easier if it showed a little more and asked to sign some checks. Dilip also did as the manager said that it would be easy, the loan would also come. The manager and the borrower developed a friendship with . In such a way that their friendship grew, they became close friends. Dilip Merchant, Employee Loan Provider of the Bank.

The employees of the bank convinced Dilip that would be easier to get a loan if the turnover was increased. Dilip was also convinced. But after 6 months, after a little doubt, Dilip dug . has been papered on a loan of crores, but when he could not use the money, he inquired about it. After a little more inquiry, the employee of the bank asked Dilip Singh to cut the cake on the anniversary of the bank’s {{}. whereas outsiders are not included in the bank’s internal programs. Even after a couple of days of , the cold of doubt had entered Dilip’s mind. He then added . But by then it was too late. The money was transferred by taking loans in the name of various companies in the name of Dilip’s family. Carrying the burden of loan to Oli, the employees of the bank had cleared other files that were damaged. In this process, the employees of the bank had to autograph the signature of the borrower, make a payment order by scanning it digitally, transfer the amount without the knowledge of the borrower,even keep the borrower’s money in the account of employees of the bank, transfer the amount to the account of the relatives of the {{} employees of the bank. When Dilip Singh Oli came to know everything, he had no option but to shout and shout. If you don’t take a loan, you can see a loan on paper. The bank employees used the money by faking what they were not doing. Right now, there is a debt of crores of on my head, there is not even a thousand in the account.

Now let’s also understand where of the bank’s happened here.

1. The most mischievous transactions have been seen between the borrower and the employees of the bank. It is completely illegal to transfer money from the account of any borrower to the account of an employee of the bank . And this illegal act has been done by the employees of Siddhartha Bank. Even the bank itself has accepted this misconduct of the employees and has suspended those employees. 

2. The payment order has been made by scanning the signature of the borrower. Take a look at the excerpt of this signature that has been scanned once. At first glance, the money has been transferred on the basis of such papers, which appear to be fake. In some payment orders, the amount amount is not even matched in letters and digits, but in such cases it seems that the payment has been made. 

3. In many cheques, the borrower has been asked to pay the amount, but the name of the recipient has been filled in by the employee in different letters. To get money, any company should either borrow money, or have money for sales. But the money has gone to a bank bank that they don’t know. And the fact that the name of the company was filled in by the employees themselves is also evident from the letters and {{}. Currently, employees of the bank are out of contact. They did not come in contact with us when we tried to contact them. Dilip Singh Oli claims, “They have fled to India. ‘

Let’s also look at the weaknesses of the debtor Dilip Singh Oli.

1. Only the loan should be paid. Taking a loan is not a small matter. It is wrong to hit the correct and give a blank check to someone else. As soon as he felt cheated, he immediately took the help of the police, which he did not do, it was a weakness.

2. He came to the media as if he was not a mortal. But in the meantime, he has also behaved in a way that is contrary to the provisions related to cyber law and defamation. The employees of the bank have also admitted their mischief in various messages and calls. Instead of seeking legal remedy, he has recorded all those calls and made all the messages public in the media. Which is wrong in Nepal’s prevailing law. Moreover, the borrower has made public that these are fraudsters and thieves by keeping the photos and phone numbers of everyone from the CEO to the employee. Some employees may be badass, but no one should take the matter of a bank’s reputation so lightly. Adding the CEO to may not be the correct just because the employee has done wrong. He has alleged that all the settings were done by Pradeep Pant. We are not saying that Pradeep did not take bribe, or that he is not a bribe taker, just because we know him a little, but this is not a matter of confirmation before the investigation. It is certainly not fair for a CEO who has been banking for a long time and is known as a cow CEO to be a fraud. Again, another bitter reality is that caste is not seen when you love, you don’t look at the law when you are agitating, just as you don’t look at what happens when you feel pain. Although not so different emotionally, legally, Oli did not do anything right about calling others thieves, liars.

Overall, Dilip Singh Oli’s entire family is in pain right now.Some wrong employees have deceived him, he has been deceived. It must be investigated. Because Siddhartha Bank is not a place to cheat a few employees, it is a public company trusted by many depositors and invested by many ordinary investors. The issue is that there was a scam of Rs 23 crore. No one has the right to change even 23 paise, let alone 23 crores. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate this matter properly. 

Finally, we must also say that looking at a few incidents, Bank should not be said to be a thief or a fraudster. However, it should not be forgotten that bank also to the bank if an incident happens, it is a question of the victim’s whole life. When a Ganesh Nepali dies, questions have been raised on the government, and when a businessman is in pain, dying and on the verge of surviving, should be responsible. The landline was out of order, so the information officer said The bank should not behave as the information officer said to the child. (Video)

https://www. youtube. com/watch? v=wbwblnJvAsQ