. Are you painting your home? If you are , then you are preparing to paint the house today. When it comes to painting your house, you must have thought that 7 to 10 will last. It has to last. However, if the color you are wearing is Berger’s, then the color can fade away in 7 months, let alone 7 years. At this time, neither the company will listen to you , nor will you find any remedy. Only your money will be wasted, the neighbor will sneak {{} about what poor color you are wearing, and your head will ache looking at your own house. This is not an accusation made by us, it is a proven fact. Berger paints are said to last for 7 to 10 years after not even 7 months, after starting to dry after 6 months, is a surprising fact that }} customer got . Moreover, the sad truth of the poor sales of the company and the poor {{} response is that even when you complain that the color that lasts for7 months, the money was wasted, and the poor sales. Yes, it has been proved that Berger sells inferior colors, it has also been revealed that the company selling inferior colors does not respond to and and the court itself has ruled that the seller of inferior paint should pay compensation to those who buy the color .

How did someone who painted Berger paints at home suffer? How did the color that lasts 7 years get dried up before 7 months? And then happened, now let’s understand.

Berger bought by Dayaram Karki from a dealer in Bhaktapur } and Nicholson (Nepal) Berger Paints sold by the company. However, the color that was said to last at least 7 was sold in 7 months . Deepak Raj Giri also bought the color that he had warranty for 10 years, after 6 months, started to fade, until 8 months he could not see the house. After that, he went to the dealer with the bill for buying the color. The dealer also admitted that the color was inferior and contacted the company. The representatives of the company came to the house and also tested it. They also admitted that the color was inferior, and also promised to re-apply another color to the house. But They did not fulfill their promise of .

A few days later, he sent a message saying that there was no defect in the color. The color bucket had a year of warranty, and he did not give a warranty accordingly. The loan was taken after seeing the advertisement saying that it was 7 to 10 years confident, but the company selling the color did not look at anything, even though the color was tattered and the house could not be seen. On the contrary, the representative of the company behaved in the style of “do what you can”, and said that there was no warranty on his color. And if there was no warranty, why was it advertised as a warranty for 7 to 10 years? When asked about this, Berger’s representatives retorted to ask the company.

The victims then went to the Consumer Court. The court looked for evidence that the paint had faded, and the victims showed photos and videos of their abandoned home. The court examined the paint buckets and boxes. It looked at the bill at the time of purchase. It looked at the photos and videos of the advertisement mentioning the warranty. The court looked at the fact that the color box called Berger Weathercoat Allguard had the words ‘Exterior Wall Paint, Silicone Enhanced’, ‘Weathercoat: Long Life Exterior Emulsion with PU’. The court also noted the fact that the paint boxes had a logo saying ‘Warranty 7 years’ and some of them said ‘Warranty 10 years’. The court also looked at the fact that the advertisements made by the company said that there was a 7-year warranty for the ‘Weather Coat All Guard’. And finally, the court held that the consumer was deceived in the name of Berger and the company that sold Berger Paints should compensate the consumer.

The court has awarded compensation to the victims after it was proved that Berger had sold substandard goods in 7 months saying that it would last for 7 years. This has also revealed the fact that on the one hand, Berger used to claim anything in the name of advertisement and on the other hand, Berger’s colors were inferior. Dayaram Karki had purchased paints worth Rs 1,45,894, Deepak Raj Giri Rs 1,19,941 and Shrestha Rs 3,45,841. However, after the paint that was supposed to last for 7 years did not last even 7 months, Karki and Giri went to court claiming that the company should do it, according to the Consumer Protection Act, 2075. Finally, the court awarded Rs 3,46,100 to Giri, Rs 6,34,800 to Shrestha and Rs 2,97,500 to Karki. A division bench of Justices Gehendra Raj Regmi and Ananda Raj Pokhrel issued the verdict.

The court not only asked the Berger to compensate the poor paint sellers, but also found that the advertisement being done by the company was wrong. The court said that the brand ‘Weathercoat Long Life: Exterior Emulsion with PU’ was advertised through the media as ‘Repels Heavy Rain, Guarantee of 10 Years’. Not only this, the company had written a strange condition in the warranty certificate that only those who buy more than 40 liters of color should be given. The warranty should also be in one liter. The court has also said this fact. The court held that the condition of ‘warranty certificate issued for consumer Siddhanta Shrestha as ‘warranty is given on a minimum purchase of 40 litres of weather coat all guard’ was also not correct in law. “While advertising the colour and sending it to the market for sale, it could not be considered reasonable to advertise the condition that each box has a warranty but that a minimum of 40 litres should be required for the issuance of a warranty certificate . “, the judgment said.

The court has ruled that not only the Berger who sells the inferior paint but also the dealer of that color should pay compensation. According to Section 7 (1) (f) and Section 11 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2075, Berger Jensen & Nicholson (Nepal) Pvt. Ltd. and Dealer Dealer Friends Forever Trading Pvt. Ltd. have to pay Rs. 12,78,400 as compensation.

Dayaram Karki and Deepak Raj Giri raised their voice about the inferior paint sold by Berger, went to court and got compensation. How many of you may have been damaged by the color of Berger in the same way, you must also be stressed after the color sold for 7 to 10 years has faded in 7 months. The company does not accept the mistake, you may also be upset when the house is damaged. If there is , then the court will support you, fight the legal battle. If you feel that the tension of a lawyer is with you, then we are with you, dare to call the wrong wrong, we will support you in the rest of your legal battle. But Berger or anyone else has no right to be negligent in their dream home just because Nepalis are innocent. We must fight against wrongdoing. (Video)

https://www. youtube. com/watch? v=qWqfYGlPIeA